Related Articles

3 Comments

  1. 1

    anonymous

    You need to check your circulation figures. rooi rose’s latest figure was 112 905, and not the 50 890 that you quote in your article. One would assume you would have corrected this on your online version of the article as you were notified of this mistake when the article came out in print.  

  2. 2

    Lucysebaas

    I read 104 533, not 50 890.

  3. 3

    tmo_admin

    Thanks Anonymous. While the error was corrected in the form of an apology by the editor of The Media magazine in the next issue, it wasn’t corrected in the original Word documents that we use to upload content to The Media Online site. We corrected it the minute rooi rose drew our attention to the error via Twitter and apologise for the mistake. The 104 533 figure quoted was based on the ABCs from Q1 2012.

Comments are closed.

Copyright © 2015 The Media Online. All rights reserved. Part of Wag the Dog Publishers