Related Articles


  1. 1

    Hedley Heale

    Hi Sam,
     I can see why Wikileaks exists because you are writing as if Bradley Manning has been charged and convicted of a crime. The facts are that he has not been charged yet and is still being held in solitary confinement conditions that look as though the US has downloaded a copy of the old RSA BOSS manual  on how to torture people until they confess to anything. If you and your fellow journalists did real investigative work instead of following the rubbish press releases that are churned out by governments around the world. Get real, do your job properly and don’t regurgitate propaganda. Scientific journalism is at least is based on confirmed documentation rather than wishful thinking.

  2. 2


    The system is broken: abuse of power and lack of accountability is rife in both politics and journalism.  We cannot prop up this system because of the fear of what might replace it.  Neither politicians nor journalists are telling the public what we need to know.  Anyone that can step into this void in any way is welcome.  If we allow things to continue the way they have been, politicians will bankrupt and ruin us while journalists distract us with tabloid stories.

  3. 3

    Antony Evans

    I’ve read and re-read your piece, and here is the executive summary: “Leaks are great and all that, but let me get in a few cheap digs at Julian Assange and his organisation – because that is the trendy thing to do..”  Because beyond that, you are not saying anything of real substance.

    Leaks are worthless if they not newsworthy. They are not newsworthy unless they reveal criminal or duplicitous behaviour. The solution to the perceived “harm” or “risks” of leaks, is for governments and organisations not to engage in criminal or duplicitous activity. If that is Utopian, fine. Utopia might not be achievable, but it is the direction all societies have to aim towards to avoid corruption, tyranny and endless war. The solution is not for whistle-blowers to clam up.

    As for poor Bradley Manning, well, if he was the leaker and the Lamo tapes are to be trusted, there is not much Wikileaks could have done about the “management of his future”. But I’m pretty sure that he is delighted with the global impact his leaks have had under the management of Wikileaks.

    So welcome to a growing band of journalists chewing on sour grapes. Wikileaks: You can knock it, but you can’t even begin to rival it.

  4. 4


    This author assumes for a fact that Manning was the source. Where does he get his information? From a psychologically challenged person called Adrian Lemo who had chat logs that he could have written himself for all we know? From US prosecutors who desperately need a culprit? This author and article is biased, obviously. Hot air, nothing more.

  5. 5


    Oh dear, where to start? Well, here goes:

    Firstly, Manning is the alleged source of the documents. Naming him as the WikiLeaks source without this caveat strengthens the overriding narrative that assumes Manning’s guilt and therefore diminishes his chances of a fair unprejudiced trial. Like anybody else who has not been convicted of a crime, Manning deserves to be presumed innocent, even by Sam Sole, who claims to know a thing or two about media manipulation and journalistic standards.

    Secondly, the insinuation that Wikileaks have failed in their duty of care for Manning is dishonest. Wikileaks’ systems are designed to ensure that leakers’ identities cannot be known. Even Wikileaks’ detractors, such as former staffer Daniel Domscheit-Berg, who have debunked other myths around the organization, have confirmed this fact. If the evidence that is available in the public domain is to be believed, Manning revealed himself to Adrian Lamo (// who in turn informed US authorities. And that’s a big if, as Lamo who has a history of mental health problems (// has been making conflicting claims about the content of the chat logs and may not be a reliable source of information.

    Thirdly, Assange has stated that he had concerns about the effect the publication of the diplomatic cables might have on the situation of the rightly or wrongly accused Manning. However, he was not in a position to delay publication, as The Guardian and New York Times had decided to go ahead and publish the cables without Wikileaks’ permission (// – Assange interview: 13:57). This latter fact has been confirmed by reporters from Der Spiegel (//,1518,742163,00.html) Also, Assange made the point that the cables had to be published eventually, otherwise the US government would have effectively been holding Manning as a hostage to prevent the publication. This mechanism can currently be observed in the situation of Rudolf Elmer who passed discs allegedly containing Swiss banking data to Wikileaks and has been in jail ever since (//,curpg-4.cms)   

    Fourthly, Sam Sole may find the notion of ‘scientific journalism’ quaint, but I suspect that just like me, many readers have found it enlightening to see how different papers have reported identical source material. The excessive redaction of sources by both the Guardian (// ; // and the New York Times (// has certainly given me a fresh perspective on the standard of reporting in these two papers.

    Fifthly, regarding Wikileaks agenda and the potential damage of leaks to open societies: Here Sam Sole would do well to remember that it was not just Wikileaks but the media partners (all of them news organizations with impeccable standards or so they would claim) who judged that the material was in the public interest and should be covered in their newspapers and magazines. So while Sole may claim that it is correct to “view Assange […] as being engaged in an attack on ‘the system’ itself”, all the media partners are equally complicit. They selected the newsworthy cables and redacted them for publication, so they must shoulder an equal amount of any praise or blame for the “blows against the US Imperium” and the “consequences [of] these blows”.

  6. 6

    Harvey Mundane

     Just another feeble attack by a ‘journalist’ who is scared of real journalism. Or a journalist that is just scared. The truth is that most media outlets have been failing the public and have just become stenographers for governments. I just read a good novel – one of the characters is a whistle-blower – it is very revealing of the world we live in. //

  7. 7


    “The journalist will usually have much more experience of this danger than the source and will have to take some responsibility for helping to protect that source.”

    Perhaps you don’t understand the nature of Wikileaks? They set up a truly anonymous system in which they themselves DO NOT KNOW the identity of their sources. That’s the whole point. Perhaps you want them to have a more stringent warning on their page: “BTW, don’t go bragging about your leaks to unreliable ex-con hackers with strong government ties.”

     “…the penalties for disclosure [in China or Russia] so much more severe.”
    More severe than a year of torture through solitary confinement before any conviction, as has been faced by Bradley Manning? I’d say the U.S. government is doing it’s best to emulate those great totalitarian states through fear, intimidation and torture.

    “To believe that the exercise of power can be somehow cleverly cut off from the pursuit of secrecy is to misunderstand the nature of power and social organisation itself.”

    That’s a surprising statement coming from a journalist, whose job is to bring transparency to powerful governments and corporations. The modern viewpoint embodied by Assange and his supporters is that secrecy inevitably becomes the oppressive tool of these self-anointed elites. A modern society should avoid the “exercise of power” and instead work to decentralize power and give it back to the people with a new, truly transparent and democratic system. 

  8. 8


    This article shows an incredibly foxy way to pledge allegiance to the State, and exemplary meekness camouflaged with a pretense on independent thinking (the obvious self-illusion).
    The coquettish Mr. Leigh (Guardian) will be elated.  

  9. 9


    First why on earth did u delete my post? 

    When did Assange claim that leaking is easier in unjust societies? I guess he meant that it is easier in a world connected through a global internet!  And WL DID have more effect in the Middle East by outing dictators and confirming to the people that the US shared their view of corrupt politicians!

    By the way it was and remains Lamo who betrayed Manning to the authorities and NOT Assange!

  10. 10


    The photo of Sam Sole at the top of the page shows him donning a ginormous moustache. That photo alone is enough to discredit this already terribly dull and poor article by a journalist who fails to see the nature and purpose of wikileaks

  11. 11


    Don’t confuse Sam Sole with a journalist.  When I was in elementary school, I was punished for writing one sentence paragraphs.  If I had only known then that I could have claimed to be pursuing a career in journalism (defined in the loose sense).  You should learn to back up your claims with other sources. 

    It is clear that 99% of people’s knowledge of what is in the Wikileaks
    data will come from these mediated sources, not from the raw data.

    Because Sam Sole statistical analysis says it is.

    This article is simply a poorly written piece for narcissistic purposes.

  12. 12


     who says they do not a right to exist, with all the b.s corruption round here, we need wikileaks!

  13. 13


    People of Japan…… I feel so sorry for the disaster happened to you. But someone should speak the truth “who is behind this???”. Do not even think or believe that, “it is a natural disaster”. Near Haiti US Marin had run the same test with powerful nuclear weapon which caused massive destructive Earthquake in that country. Immediately President of Haiti accused American Vulture Navy for this crime. People of Japan, please have a look at the source of the earthquake, isn’t it near your power house? Obviously if some one wants to destroy your country should hit the power plant first. This is a pre-planned strategic destruction US has planned against Japan, being jealous of your prosperity they used their mass destructive weapon in the ocean bed. They planted this weapon in the ocean bed using the submarine of US Marines (as they had been successful with the test on Haiti). Now who is there to put this conspiracy on International court against US?  Also International court is controlled by them. US is now losing in their economy. So they are trying to destroy other rich countries Economy like Japan’s. Japan and other prosperous countries like China should be careful of US conspiracy and strengthen their Defense system. Otherwise US will be playing with their fate as they are playing with Arab countries. Also pay attention at this specific type of stealth weapon they are using. Some high-tech defense system has to be invented to stop this type of MASS DESTRUCTION.      

Comments are closed.

Copyright © 2015 - 2019 The Media Online. All rights reserved. Part of Arena Holdings (Pty) Ltd.