Related Articles

3 Comments

  1. 1

    Anonymous

    The 2009 Rakai team (Wawer/Gray) study that reported Ugandan men that were CIRCUMCISED were 50% MORE likely to infect their female partners than men that are uncircumcised (have their natural genitals). Also, real world population studies show cutting off genital parts does NOT help prevent HIV, HPV and other sexually transmitted infections in men!

    The HIV prevalence rate among circumcised males between the ages of 15 and 49 in Zimbabwe is higher than that of the uncircumcised male” after a US funded circumcision drive. This mutilation practice may well help spread HIV.

    No one should force this, we must not pay for this and we must not “urge” this.

  2. 2

    Anonymous

    Making it a taboo to compare male with female sexual
    mutilation is the biggest scandal of the controversy. In both
    instances the most sensitive and most erogenous zone of the
    human body is amputated and severely damaged. In both
    instances, what counts primarily is the cutting of human
    sexuality. The imposition of control by the patriarchy.

    What is lacking in all the talk about circumcision is
    discussion of its

    archeological dimension – that it is the left over of human
    sacrifice.

    What kind of god is it that asks a people to sacrifice? Or a
    people who create such a god for themselves?

    Also, unfortunately it is / has been circumcision that has
    MADE for no end of anti-semitic sentiments. Freud found that
    it was the chief reason for unconscious anti-Semitism. And the
    myths surrounding it are at the core of the “blood libel.”
    Thus, it’s time to eliminate the Brit Milah because if that is
    the chief reason for being anti-Semitic or anti-Abrahamic
    [Islam too practices the rite] then why hang on to this
    left-over of human sacrifice? that traumatizesthe child,
    cutting off 5,000 nerves, that is the equivalent of female
    circumcision in the sense that it eliminates everything but
    the clitoris,and only serves the UltraOrthodox to maintain
    their power? After all, reform Judaism sought to eliminate the
    rite in the 19th century, and Jewish identity depends on being
    born by a Jewish mother, or converting. Here a link to an
    archive of the entire German and then some debate, note
    especially Michael Wolffsohn’s two pieces . Circumcision has
    been controversial also within Jewry forever.

    http://analytic-comments.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-circumcision-debate-links-and.html

    http://analytic-comments.blogspot.com/2012/10/michael-wolffsohns-foreskin-of-heart.html

    http://www.facebook.com/mike.roloff1?ref=name

    =======================

  3. 3

    Brian

    The circumcision campaign is corrupt and prays on trusting young men. If they can convince you to have the most important sexual tissue removed-( and they take ALL of it) – they will make millions in grants and salaries. Do not trust the people pushing circumcision. Keep your foreskin and get tested. Wear condoms . Be faithful and honest . Protect your children from these people!

Comments are closed.

Copyright © 2015 The Media Online. All rights reserved. Part of Wag the Dog Publishers