Diverting State spending to non-critical and captured South African media during the Zuma era was not particularly successful because government advertising and marketing spend has never accounted for more than 10 percent of total adspend in South Africa.
This is one of the findings of Paying the Piper, newly-released research into the state of media in South Africa in a time of digital transformation and political uncertainty that was launched at the recent World Media Economics and Management Conference held in Cape Town.
The report draws on a wide range of papers and reports commissioned as part of a research project by Rhodes University’s School of Journalism and Media Studies.
It not only identifies problems facing local media, but also explores strategies for economic sustainability at a time when legacy media has its back to the wall as tech giants like Facebook, Twitter and Google devour the lion’s share of advertising revenue. The report predicts that the stranglehold of these companies will increase, and estimates that by the end of 2018, about 17-million South Africans will be on Facebook and eight-million will be on Twitter.
It makes several far-reaching recommendations that include increasing the budget of the Media Development and Diversity Agency (MDDA) to R1-billion by the early 2020s; enforcing the Public Finance Management Act to stop public money being spent on news platforms without independently audited audience figures; imposing a tax or levy on Google and Facebook’s South African revenues; and creating a South African Investigative Journalism Fund with recovered state capture money.
While longer-term damage was caused to media during Zuma’s presidency, it also inadvertently boosted the credibility of journalism and helped improve some news outlets’ short term revenues, researchers found.
“In South Africa, the news industry may well be at the most ironic tipping point of all,” the report says. “Just as journalists are doing some of their most consequential and courageous exposure of state capture and the widespread looting of State resources, the industry’s failure to address its own contractions, and come to terms with digital media (and in particular the phenomenon of social media on smartphones), is rendering the news media more vulnerable and potentially less able to serve the information needs of the broader society.”
The report makes for some very depressing reading in parts, with predictions that the bloodbath facing local media will get even worse.
“Printed newspapers in particular are starting to close and will be closing at an accelerated rate,” the report’s authors predict. “While the past two or three years have seen a revival in important national-level political reporting, local and community media is increasingly losing the struggle to survive. Dozens of community papers closed in 2015-2017, some after many decades of publishing. The Times in Johannesburg closed in January 2018. Many others will follow.”
The digital tsunami and accompanying lower revenues that has been exacerbated in South Africa by “a multi-pronged attack” by a “Zuma-centred power elite” that destabilised the SABC and interfered with media, launching regular attacks against it.
“To provide ideological justification for the creation of a large-scale and corrupt network of rent-extraction and looting, this network established a 24-hour TV news channel ANN7 and a daily newspaper, The New Age, with money improperly diverted from government departments, state owned enterprises (SOEs), and from the SABC. Operatives of this power elite have worked to undermine the independence of Independent Media.”
But, it’s not all bad news: “There is hope for journalism in South Africa: New voices are making themselves heard and new types of revenue generation … are showing much promise. There are moves to reduce the costs of connectivity and the impact of other factors that have created such a deep and wide digital divide in South Africa.”
The report also reveals a growing trend in of some of the best journalism in South Africa being funded by philanthropic grants and donations from international foundations. Local beneficiaries of this kind of support include amaBunghane, which was in the forefront of exposing state capture, and Daily Maverick and GroundUp.
But the report warns that strategies by news organisations to develop new business models and more diverse income streams are “not happening fast enough or across enough platforms to forestall a likely decline in media diversity”.
The high cost of connectivity is another major stumbling block in media’s search for new revenue models, with the stranglehold of the “effective duopolies in mobile telephony” limiting access to verified information and news for many South Africans.
But in the end the solution lies in a change in mindset by established media, the reports says.
“… everyone involved in journalism – managers, editors, journalists and journalism schools in particular – need to have a deeper understanding of how audiences are being constituted and re-constituted and what the consequences of these changes are for both the way journalism is done and the way journalism is able to attract revenues.
Raymond Joseph is a freelance journalist, journalism trainer, fake news hunter, working on a book at Southern Tip Media.
Want to continue this conversation on The Media Online platforms? Comment on Twitter @MediaTMO or on our Facebook page. Send us your suggestions, comments, contributions or tip-offs via e-mail to email@example.com.