[COMMENT] My daughter looked horrified. As she rushed towards me I could see she was really freaked out.
She was doing some research for a history essay she was writing about racism in entertainment and education, and she had found something that she could not believe was actually used as an educational tool.
It was a counting book used in American education in the 1920s and 1930s called ‘The Ten Little Niggers’! Her research had brought to light some unbelievable racism that was deemed perfectly acceptable at the time. The ‘black face’ in entertainment is right up there with the worst of the examples.
This got me thinking about racism, sexism and other dangerous stereotyping in advertising. Let me be clear, there is a big difference between unacceptable bigotry such as these examples, and controversial advertising.
When I think of the best examples of controversial advertising, I immediately think of the Nando’s library of ads. These are controversial but also spectacular at opening up conversations not normally be frowned upon because this brand produces ads that say what many of us are thinking. Their latest ‘You People’ is a brilliant example. They are controversial, but not bigoted.
We are all aware of a recent H&M ad that led to the physical destruction of some of their stores. There were two camps of opinions – one ranting that people were over sensitive and that it was blown out of proportion, and then there were those in the second camp that were extremely offended and wanted retribution. Who was right and who was wrong?
“Offensive advertisements can be defined as any kind of communication that disrespects certain accepted norms of society, or offends someone. Marketers these days spend extra time to ensure not to offend anyone with their campaigns”.
I suppose it can be argued that this makes for some very boring advertising, but I firmly believe that ads can be both clever and exciting without being truly offensive.
Before we look at brands doing it right, there are some unbelievably blatant racist and sexist ads that beggars belief. I mean, I can’t believe that these ads were actually approved and flighted.
I just kept finding more and more examples…
Are these ads controversial? Offensive? Both?
I’m sure that there are many who remember the outcry when the Joko/Hangar TV ad first aired. The ad was made and produced with pure intentions, but it created such controversy. Was the dignity of hard working black South African women being compromised in this ad?
Even charities can get it horribly wrong. The charity Feed A Child created an ad that was enormously racially controversial. It shows a black child being petted and fed treats like a pet dog, by a rich white woman. The message was supposed be that the average dog eats better than millions of children – but boy, was that a terrible execution of the idea!
But we have come a long way and some brands are getting it right by challenging stereotypes that have stood for generations. For instance, Johnny Walker is breaking gender stereotypes.
Typically housewife territory brands like OMO are shredding other stereotypes.
Brands are also taking note of all religions and aren’t afraid to embrace this in their marketing.
Even cities are placing ads that are confronting racism.
While LÓreal is embracing all races and celebrating our differences.
In conclusion, I’ve been horrified by what in the past has been seen as acceptable advertising, but I’ve also seen brands that are getting it right as well. There’s still work to be done, but embracing each other’s differences while seeing what brings us together, is the key to advertising to all, in the future.
Want to continue this conversation on The Media Online platforms? Comment on Twitter @MediaTMO or on our Facebook page. Send us your suggestions, comments, contributions or tip-offs via e-mail to email@example.com.